Photo Essay: Bhopal gas tragedy
The UCIL
factory was built in 1969 to produce the pesticide Sevin (UCC’s brand name
for carbaryl) using methyl isocyanate (MIC) as an intermediate. An MIC
production plant was added in 1979.
|
In the midnight of December 2-3, 1984, water entered a
tank containing 42 tons of MIC. The resulting exothermic reaction increased the
temperature inside the tank to over 200 °C (392 °F) and raised the pressure.
The tank vented releasing toxic gases into the atmosphere. The gases were blown
by northwesterly winds over Bhopal. The problem was made worse by the
mushrooming of slums in the vicinity of the plant, non-existent catastrophe
plans, and shortcomings in health care and socio-economic rehabilitation.
■Storing MIC (methyl isocyanate) in large tanks and
filling beyond recommended levels
■Poor maintenance after the plant
ceased MIC production at the end of 1984
■Failure of several safety systems
(due to poor maintenance)
■Safety systems being switched off to save
money—including the MIC tank refrigeration system which could have mitigated
the disaster severity
Instead of leaking gas into the skies, the old UC
factory leaks deadly chemicals into the soil and ultimately into the water
supply of locals. Approximately 8,000 tons of toxic and carcinogenic chemicals
lie abandoned in the old plant, including mercury, due in large part to a lack
of political willpower to enforce the financing of a multimillion dollar
cleanup operation. Over two decades of monsoons have washed much of these
chemicals in to an underground aquifer which feeds in to wells and boreholes
used by locals to extract drinking water.
In 1989 Rajiv Gandhi’s government came to an out of
court settlement with Union Carbide India Limited without consulting survivors,
under which $470m — the exact sum UC was afforded by their insurers — would be
paid in compensation resolving all outstanding legal issues.
COMPENSATION - At
first glance this figure may appear significant, but after being divided
between roughly 550,000 people, and with various administrative problems, it
amounted to approximately $500 per victim to cope with a lifetime of misery,
or, 7p a day. This is the cost of a cup of tea. Prior to this settlement,
victims had received $5 per month, and stunningly, even this figure was
stingily deducted from the final pay out. Amazingly, UC also failed to take responsibility
for the disaster, speaking instead of ‘sabotage’.
In 1994, most probably as a strategy to avoid further
liability and in light of threats by Indian courts to seize their assets, UC
sold its Indian branch to Eveready Industries India Limited. UC was then
officially purchased by the Dow Chemical Company in 2001, a controversial
corporation with a murky history. Whereas Dow was quick to set aside billions
for UC asbestos workers in Texas, it immediately denied liability for UC’s
doings in Bhopal, stating that the 1989 payment fulfilled their financial
responsibility to the disaster.
The survivors' organisations have handed over the new
documents to the Central Bureau of Investigations (CBI), which is now pursuing
the extradition of Warren Anderson to India, following repeated orders to do so
from the Bhopal District Court. The Indian government had all along assumed, on
the basis of flawed legal advice given to it, that the evidence on record was
not sufficient to meet the `probable cause standard' applicable in the U.S. in
extradition matters. (A U.S. court will not agree to extradite an accused
person to another country unless there is prima facie evidence directly linking
him to the cause of the disaster — Frontline, January 18, 2002.) It may now
have to reconsider its stand in the light of these "discoveries".
People have protested in London Olympics against the Dow Chemicals’
sponsorship.








No comments:
Post a Comment